Unfair enough for some MCS aspirants
Marchang Reimeingam *
Manipur Public Service Commission (MPSC) Building in Imphal in March 2013 :: Pix - Deepak Oinam
Many times the aspirants of Manipur Civil Services (MCS) hope for fair competition, also Government of Manipur promises to fulfil this hope, while some of them were scared assuming that it would be tough and some felt unfair which could not be easily neglected.
How tough or competitive the MCS examination is ? The level of competition seems to be abysmally low. Out of the 542 total numbers of candidates who appeared for main examination; 275 appeared for the personality test. This gives a ratio of 1:2. That means candidate who cleared preliminary examination has a 50 percent chance of getting through the main examination.
Subsequently, only 138 candidates were selected. MCS combined competitive examination conducted by Manipur Public Service Commission (MPSC), Manipur, appears to be more competitive among the Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC) and even Physically Handicapped/Differently Able (DA) candidates than among the general candidates in Manipur.
For example, in the personality test (PT), more than 2 persons competed for one post among SCs or STs; however, less than 2 persons competed for a single post among general candidate. This makes an impression that every general candidate has a greater chance of getting through the examination than the reserved candidates.
Specifically, for every single candidate qualified in PT (post), 2.3 ST or SC candidates appeared in the PT that is more than the overall ratio of 1:2.
Interestingly, among the general candidates the ratio is 1:1.7 that is lower than the overall ratio. See Table 1 for details. How fair it is ? MPSC declared the results for MCS Combined Competition Examination – 2010 on 26th September 2012 (Link here); subsequently the statement of details of marks scored by the candidates of this examination was uploaded in their website (Link here ) something like in the form of RTI responses. However, MPSC failed to conceal something crucial that Scheduled caste (SC) candidate who was in the Merit List at Sl. No. 80 scoring 1281 mark, shown in the statement on details of marks notified vide No.7/4/2010-MPSC(DR), Imphal, dated the 6th of October, 2012, was listed in the Wait List Sl.No.147 vide No.7/4/2010-MPSC(DR), Imphal, 26th September 2012 signed by the Secretary, MPSC.
The cut-off mark for an (able) SC candidate was 1245. Unfortunately, the SC candidate who scored more than the cut-off mark was listed among 15 candidates in the Wait List. It is deliberate done by MPSC with certain external intervention perhaps with money or political power.
It has created an unfair enough situation for some aspirants of MCS. It disturbs psychologically to many aspirants of the top administrative jobs in Manipur the MCS. Additional unfortunate issue is that in the Recommended Merit List Sl.No.138 (general, visually impaired) who scored 652 marks that is less than the ST candidate (locomotor disability) who scored 759 marks is listed in the Not Recommended List Sl.No.275.
This disabled ST candidate scored more mark than this disabled general candidates. Both are disabled candidates, and I presume there are no separate reservations among the various types of disabled candidates. It may be early to conclude that this situation shows a clear discrimination to the ST people.
However, this is a deliberate work done by MPSC, Govt. of Manipur. Such biasness among the candidates of SC itself or physically handicapped/differently able itself is a result of high government officials’ intervention illegally and excessive corruption.
Table 1: Ratio of MCS examination (2010)
Candidate appeared in personality test (PT) qualified PT (138):mains appeared (542) qualified PT (138):appeared in PT (275) (275 Nos.): mains appeared (542)
General 1:1.6 1:2.7 1:1.7
ST 1:2.0 1:4.4 1:2.3
SC 1:2.9 1:6.7 1:2.3
OBC 1:2.3 1:4.5 1:2.0
Handicapped/DA 1:1.1 1:2.0 1:1.8
All 1:2.0 1:4.0 1:2.0
Source: Calculated by Reimeingam Marchang based on data from (here) and here
* Marchang Reimeingam wrote this article for The Sangai Express
This article was posted on May 17, 2013.
* Comments posted by users in this discussion thread and other parts of this site are opinions of the individuals posting them (whose user ID is displayed alongside) and not the views of e-pao.net. We strongly recommend that users exercise responsibility, sensitivity and caution over language while writing your opinions which will be seen and read by other users. Please read a complete Guideline on using comments on this website.