India: Reinforcing subordination of women in law and practice
June 9, 2014:
ALRC-CWS-26-16-2014
June 9, 2014
*/HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL/** *
*/Twenty sixth session, Agenda Item 3, Interactive Dialogue with Special Rapporteur on Discrimination against Women/*
* **A written submission to the UN Human Rights Council by the Asian Legal Resource Centre*
***INDIA: Reinforcing subordination of women in law and practice***
To formally recognize the existence of discrimination against women
in India, both in law and in practice, the country has acceded to the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against
Women (CEDAW) in 1993, undertaking obligation to eliminate "any
distinction, exclusion or restriction" made on the basis of sex which
impairs or nullifies "the recognition, enjoyment or exercise" women's
"human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic,
social, cultural, civil or any other field." This duty, however, is
still waiting due recognition and implementation by the state.
In India, discrimination against women in law and practice is
multi-layered and complex, owing to country's social, political,
economic, and cultural fibers. Discrimination against women in India
arises from multiple, intertwined, and pervasive sources, deeply
influenced by the negative elements of caste, gender, marital status,
customs and traditions, sexual orientation, economic empowerment,
level of education, decision making power, poverty, prejudiced
attitudes, and negative stereotyping in private and public spaces
among others. Indian laws, as well as law makers, have yet to
seriously recognize these aspects in the criminal justice system to
ensure equality and non-discrimination regarding women.
Despite adopting constitutional guarantee of non-discrimination
against women and affirmative action-like policy of reservations in
certain sectors, discrimination against women in India remains both
direct and indirect. Women are directly discriminated against for
certain employment on the pretext of their supposed inferiority and
negative stereotyping, especially regarding promotion to managerial
posts. Due to these stereotypes, women are also not considered for
employment in security sectors like the armed forces. Laws dealing
with marriage and inheritance are discriminatory as codifications of
personal and customary laws for many communities have yet to be
initiated. Indirect discrimination causes females to be the first ones
to be discarded from list of beneficiary of public schemes for obvious
reasons like lack of capital, land, adequate training, education, and
other assets.
Social conditioning encourages discrimination against women that
begins at home. This is due to the fundamental basis of the social and
cultural order of Indian family, an institution that women are born
into. Families are based on male hierarchy, a fundamental
contradiction to the notion of equality and non-discrimination. Indian
families protect male dominance to enforce power and control over
autonomy of the female members. In this way, women's subordination is
reinforced by the tentacles of patriarchy manifested in discrimination
at multiple levels through out women's life cycle. This omnipresent
cycle of discrimination against women is often described as
discrimination "from the womb to the tomb". Such social conditioning
to discriminate against women is reflected in the law as well. For
example, marriageable age determined by law still discriminates
against women; it is fixed by the state as 18 years while that of a
man is 21 years. Early marriage compared to men acts as a barrier for
women in education, livelihood, and employment compelling them to be
economically dependent on their male counterparts, who are favoured by
the law to continue focusing on professional and personal development.
One of the prime manifestations of discrimination is violence
against women in family, community, and the labour market, that
indoctrinates subordination to women, compromising self-esteem and
leading to a life without dignity. Discriminatory cultural practices,
such as dowry, honour killings, witch hunting, etc. are widely
prevalent in India. Women's subordinated status in the society,
reinforces the promotion of male child preference. Consequently,
female infanticide and female feticide, with the help of modern
scientific medical technologies, has degraded the population sex ratio
in the country while legal texts prohibiting such practices remain
merely symbolic. Traditional practices in the name of religion can be
equally blamed for negative cultural practices against women.
Security of person and property for women, however, supersedes all
forms of violence. Gender based violence, rampant all over India,
circumscribes women's access to livelihood opportunities and personal
development while restricting their mobility. Despite several
amendments in criminal laws favouring women, law enforcement remains
inaccessible to women due to the high level of insensitivity and lack
of professionalism in country's criminal justice mechanism. It is an
established fact that women prefer silence over approaching law
enforcement institution, such as the police, especially if the
violence is sexual in nature. Women are also discouraged from seeking
justice for sexual violence as they are perceived as symbols of
"honour" for the family and community.
Women face discrimination in armed conflict situation as well. In
India, armed conflict is ongoing in about 21 states and women there
are affected disproportionately due to violence perpetrated by both
state and non-state actors. Armed conflicts radicalize, utilize and
encourage patriarchal dicta unilaterally imposed on women. In
addition, sexualized violence committed by the armed actors is often
used as a "weapon of war" that leaves women stigmatized for the rest
of their life. In India, special legislative measures like Armed
Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 and its equivalents permitting
arbitrary detention are applicable in armed conflict areas of north
east India, Chhattisgarh, Jammu, and Kashmir. Such legislations allows
extrajudicial executions and involuntary disappearances with impunity
and leaves women as widows and forced to live a life full of
uncertainties, as documented by Asian Human Rights Commission, the
sister organisation of the Asian Legal Resource Centre. The culture of
impunity for sexual violence is endemic and is also a regular feature
witnessed in armed conflict areas of India.
Much of the consistent and deep rooted pattern of discrimination
against women in India can be attributed to the "sameness" (women are
considered equal to men in terms of rights and duties) and
"protectionist" (women are excluded for their own security from rights
and duties) approach of addressing inequality by the policy makers in
framing laws and consequently in practice. This approach, to date, has
posed a significant barrier to women's equal participation in the
decision making bodies, like the parliament of INDIA: the most
important law making institution in the country having profound
potential for eliminating discrimination against women. However,
women's entry to this institution remains poor in spite of a few
exceptional leaders. To reverse this discrimination, an affirmative
action-like reservation of 33 percent of the seats for women in the
entire legislatures was initiated. However, such a pro-women proposal
passed in upper house of the parliament lacks political will and is
still catching dust in the lower house of the parliament with a /sine
qua non/ status. In last general election (2009), representation of
women in leadership and decision making positions for the country was
confined to only 11.4 percent of parliamentarians, the lowest in South
Asia, despite the fact that almost 50 percent of the electors in the
country are female. The status didn't change much in the recently
concluded general election of 2014. It was observed that major
political parties discriminated against women in nominating them as
candidates. Major political parties like the Indian National Congress
nominated 56 women and that of Bharatiya Janata Party nominated only
35 candidates.
A total of 636 women out of 8,163 candidates contested
and 191 of them contested independently. The statistics of
representation remains marginalized with only 61 women
parliamentarians out of a total of 543 seats in the lower house of the
parliament. In local governance, though the 73rd and 74th amendment to
the Constitution of India confirmed 33 percent of seats are reserved
for women, areas marked under sixth schedule and other special status
areas under the constitution are left out of this scheme. Systematic
exclusion from decision making body through their marginalized
demography in parliament over a period of time has adverse effects on
her entitlements and rights spanning a spectrum of political, public,
economic, and social subjects. A change in political landscape
affirming equal participation of women is required to further pursue
non-discrimination.
The absence of equality in the political field perpetuates harmful
discrimination. Constitutional and legal measures or policies adopted
in parliament even being labeled as good practices to protect,
respect, and promote women's rights on par with men, suffers from
inherent inadequacies and lacks any proper implementation apparatus.
In addition, insensitive and inefficient institutions further prohibit
women from accessing justice in case of a violation or to enforce her
rights.
Inadequate resource allocations for implementation of laws and
policies promoting women's equality remain a challenge. The
Prohibition of Domestic Violence Act 2005 is an example. Gender
budgeting, though adopted in 1990s for mainstreaming gender in state
apparatus, is yet to be proved as a strategy rather than a mere
catchphrase.
Nearly half of India's population is women. In order to achieve
equitable social, political, and economic justice, elimination of
discrimination against women in law and in practice should be treated
as a prime duty of the state. To achieve this, the Convention on
Elimination of All form of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)
advocates for adoption of a "substantive model" (equality of women in
result, not in process) of equality as a strategy that recognizes
women's unequal status in the society and stresses the importance of
equality of opportunity and equality of results at par with men.
Being a state party to CEDAW, and given that the review of
Government of India's report by CEDAW Committee is forthcoming, Indian
policy makers must ensure its commitments and obligation to adopt both
in law and in practice, the "substantive model of equality" as well as
"procedural equality" in criminal justice system as a matter of
priority that prescribes equality in results and in process.
*/About the ALRC: /*/The Asian Legal Resource Centre is an
independent regional non-governmental organisation holding general
consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United
Nations. It is the sister organisation of the Asian Human Rights
Commission. The Hong Kong-based group seeks to strengthen and
encourage positive action on legal and human rights issues at the
local and national levels throughout Asia./
* This PR was sent to e-pao.net by Asian Legal Resource Centre who can be contacted at http://www.humanrights.asia/"
This Press Release was posted on June 10, 2014
* Comments posted by users in this discussion thread and other parts of this site are opinions of the individuals posting them (whose user ID is displayed alongside) and not the views of e-pao.net. We strongly recommend that users exercise responsibility, sensitivity and caution over language while writing your opinions which will be seen and read by other users. Please read a complete Guideline on using comments on this website.