Big question on EVM : Healthy discussion on EVM is must

Hijam Rajen *

Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) have been a prominent subject of debate in Indian politics, prompting concerns from various political leaders, including those from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) like Lal Krishna Advani and scholars such as Subramanian Swamy. Notably, the introduction of EVMs in India predates the Congress government, with initial usage in a limited capacity dating back to 1982 before gradually expanding.

While apprehensions about the hackability and manipulation of EVMs have been expressed, it is crucial to differentiate between valid concerns and unfounded allegations. EVMs in India are designed with numerous security features to prevent tampering and ensure the integrity of the electoral process. Despite these safeguards, a persistent perception of vulnerability has led to skepticism among certain segments of the population.

The regional variations in concerns regarding EVMs, as highlighted, are intriguing. States like Manipur and other northeastern states have not been as vocal in expressing apprehensions about EVMs compared to some other regions. This discrepancy could be attributed to several factors.

Firstly, the level of awareness and education about EVM technology may vary among different regions and communities. States with a higher awareness and understanding of the technology might be less susceptible to unfounded fears.

Secondly, the political culture and history of a region may play a role. If there is a history of fair and transparent elections in Manipur and other northeastern states, trust in the electoral process, including the use of EVMs, may be higher.

However, it is essential to emphasize that concerns about EVMs are not confined to any specific region or community. The integrity of the electoral process is a national issue, granting citizens across the country the right to express their views and concerns.

If there are genuine concerns about the security and reliability of EVMs, it is the responsibility of election authorities and policymakers to address them transparently and take necessary measures to enhance the credibility of the electoral process.

In conclusion, while Manipur and other northeastern states may not have raised strong objections to EVMs, the broader issue of electoral integrity should be a national concern. It is crucial for citizens, irrespective of their region or community, to engage in informed discussions and advocate for improvements in the electoral system to ensure free, fair, and transparent elections.

The concern about Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) extends beyond regional differences and involves a more widespread perception of a lack of action by the Election Commission in addressing complaints. Many individuals and groups have lodged complaints regarding the integrity and security of EVMs, raising questions about the efficacy of the electoral process.

It is essential to acknowledge the grievances put forth by citizens and political leaders. Their concerns should be treated with seriousness, and a transparent and responsive approach is necessary to maintain public trust in the democratic process. The Election Commission plays a pivotal role in ensuring the fairness of elections, and any perceived inaction on their part can contribute to skepticism.

To address these concerns, it is imperative for the Election Commission to engage in open dialogue with stakeholders, including political parties, experts, and concerned citizens. A thorough and impartial investigation into the lodged complaints is crucial to either dispel fears or identify areas that need improvement.

While the Election Commission has taken steps to enhance the security features of EVMs, it is important for them to communicate these measures effectively to the public. Transparency in the functioning of electoral machinery can go a long way in building confidence among the electorate.

Moreover, the Election Commission should be proactive in adopting emerging technologies and best practices in election management to stay ahead of potential challenges. Regular audits, mock exercises, and collaboration with experts in cybersecurity can contribute to strengthening the security infrastructure surrounding EVMs.

In conclusion, the concerns raised about EVMs, coupled with perceived inaction by the Election Commission, highlight the need for a robust and responsive electoral system.

Open communication, thorough investigations, and continuous improvement in electoral technology are essential elements to ensure that the democratic process remains credible and trustworthy for all citizens, irrespective of their regional affiliations. It is in the collective interest of the nation to address these concerns promptly and transparently to uphold the democratic principles that form the foundation of the Indian electoral system.